I found this chart from Tyndale Publishers terrific. Disclaimer: They publish the NLT.
I think this chart does a great job of communicating the differences in many of the popular translations of the Bible out there today. They are all saying the same thing (with the exception of those published by cults like Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons) but they translate with slightly different goals.
My suggestion is to familiarize yourself with this chart and the translations you might use and then read several translations in your study and devotional reading. And I wouldn't feel guilty for reading one that is easier to understand instead of one that is written in a Shakespearean style just because you're grandparents do. It may be a great translation but it's not real effective if you don't understand what it's saying.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Thursday, November 04, 2010
My thoughts are at the end of this article by James Emery White. DG
Recently Starbucks unveiled its biggest overhaul in its forty-year history.
Though still a prototype, a new kind of Starbucks has launched in Seattle’s bustling Capitol Hill area which serves regional wine and beer, along with an expansive plate of locally made cheeses served on china. The barista bar is reconfigured to allow customers to sit close to the coffee.
It doesn’t really look like a Starbucks at all, but more like a café that’s been part of the neighborhood for years. So don’t be surprised when you find an outdoor deck and an indoor/outdoor fireplace.
Starbucks is trying to get the after 2 p.m. business that other java joints have been peeling away from them for years. If it works, expect it to come to a Starbucks near you.
The point isn’t about beer and wine – it’s about the importance of a “third place.”
And Starbucks wants to be that place.
Most people have two social environments: their home and their workplace (or depending on your situation in life, their home and their school).
In his book The Great Good Place, Ray Oldenburg argues that we need a “third” place. His thesis is that the home is where we live and constitutes who we live with; our workplace/school is probably where we spend the most time but is very “task” oriented in nature. We need a “third” place to provide a mooring for community life and wider, more fluid, creative interaction.
So what are the marks of a good “third” place?
Oldenburg suggests that they should be free (or at least inexpensive); provide food and drink; be highly accessible (even walking distance); encourage “regulars”; be welcoming and comfortable; and allow for both new friends and old to be found in its confines.
In the U.K., I think it’s safe to say that the “third” place has been the pub (though as a frequent traveler and fan, real ones are fading fast). In the Middle East, the Hookah lounge seems to fit the bill. In the United States, we didn’t have one. That is until Starbucks, which might explain the coffee chain business exploding into a $15 billion enterprise.
Has it ever really been about the coffee? Most taste comparisons put Dunkin’ Donuts, or lately even McDonald’s, ahead in the taste department. No, it’s where you go to read a book, meet a friend, work with others on a project…
It is a “third” place, one that we obviously want and need.
Where should the church be in this conversation?
Right in the middle.
The church, wherever she is, should be conscious of casting itself as a “third” place.
Biblically, it seemed to be a mark of the early church. We read that they met in homes, sure, but they also had a “third” place they seemed to frequent on a daily basis – the temple courts (Acts 2:46). While they may have been there to engage in actual temple worship on a daily basis (not the sacrifices, but the prayer service, cf. Acts 3:1), it is more likely they turned the temple courtyard into a first-century Starbucks in order to gather as a community (e.g., Acts 5:12).
From the beginning there seemed to be a need and a desire for the new community forged in Christ’s church to offer a real, tangible “third” place.
How is the church offering that today, or is it one more dynamic we’ve given over to the secular world as it gains even more of a hold over our lives?
People often denounce churches that invest in such things as coffee bars or bookstores, designed to allow people to congregate throughout the week and around weekend services, as if it is one more sign of selling out to the culture.
In truth, Starbucks may be reminding us how to reclaim culture.
One cup at a time.
James Emery White
“Starbucks remakes its future with an eye on beer and wine,” by Bruce Horovitz, USA Today, October 18, 2010. Online at http://www.usatoday.com/money/
Veno and ventis at a Starbucks near you, The Today Show, Tuesday, October 19, 2010. View online at http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/
The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community by Ray Oldenburg (1999).
“Third Place,” Wikipedia, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
To enjoy a free subscription to the Church and Culture blog, log-on to www.churchandculture.org, where you can post your comments on this blog, view past blogs in our archive and read the latest church and culture news from around the world.
Here are some of my quick reactions to this piece by White...
Could (and should) the church do this? (create a "third place" environment in our community) How would you do it? The entrepreneur in me says, "Let's do this thing yesterday!" The pastor in me says, "Whoa, why can't you take the church to existing 'third places'." Then I wonder, can we do both?
I really see this "Third place" in our culture (even though I don't like Starbuck's in our town). The question is, do we do it or do we just redeem the ones already out there.
Mark Batterson est. Ebeneezer's in DC and it's voted the best coffee place in Wash, DC. They give all the proceeds to missions and their offices are upstairs. (so his church budget doesn't pay for the buildings their offices are in and where at least one worship service happens nor does it appear to pay for all their missions giving). Hmmm...they seem to have embraced the 'third place' idea with great effectiveness. His blog is here.
Never thought of the Temple as a "third place"...I always equated it with the weekly worship/outreach. But I see this...
Did you ever see the Temple as inferior to the Tabernacle? Stephen seems to make this case in Acts 7. Think about it. What's the main difference in the 2? The Tabernacle is mobile...
So putting these together...does the church create 'third places', go to 'third places' or both? What do you think and why?